Wednesday, January 24, 2007


Are you a supertaster? Take a test and find out.

I am, as I already knew, a normal taster. And as my sense of smell diminishes, my desire for intense tastes ramps up. I've just written a post about all this over at eat our brains, but if you just want the facts, just go take the test.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a silly test! Each meal is savored for different reasons. I eat out for socializing and of course want to talk to my friends while eating and tasting. You can both enjoy your fellows at the table and the food simultaneously.

There COULD be a good test for determining what an individuals' tastebuds prefer, but this ain't it.

January 24, 2007 12:20 PM  
Blogger Fred said...

Exactly. There's not a question on that test that wouldn't vary with the restaurant, the menu, the circumstances in which I found myself there, any expectations I had going in, et cetera. The test seems very flawed to me, no offense to Prof. Utermohlen.

January 24, 2007 4:23 PM  
Blogger David Moles said...

Apparently I'm somewhere between a supertaster and a non-taster, but definitely not a normal taster.

I think this is because the question about conversation after the food arrives didn't have an option for "talk with your mouth full".

January 27, 2007 2:36 PM  
Blogger Tour Mistress Of The Darkness said...

I came up a "supertaster", but I already knew that. (I am the world's pickiest eater. I can't even be in the same room with broccoli or coffee, and I can't handle any of the other foods they listed, either.) That said, the questions in the survey seem utterly senseless to me. Why not ask "do you like ____"?

January 28, 2007 2:25 AM  
Blogger Derryl Murphy said...

Yeah, these surveys get silly, and yet it tells me I'm a Supertaster and indeed, I dislike coffee, cabbage (in most cases), grapefruit, and especially Brussels sprouts. I do like fresh spinach, but not the frozen pulp crap that was the only stuff my parents tried to feed me back in the day. Pretty accurate, I thought.


January 31, 2007 8:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

^^ nice blog!! ^@^

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,

徵信社,外遇, 離婚, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信,外遇, 抓姦, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社,徵信,徵信,

March 24, 2009 2:20 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home